Erotica: The thinking Person’s Porn
Too often, I have found that people label what they find offensive or crass "porn," while anything they find sexy gets the more romantic label of "erotica." One person's pornography is another's erotica!
Sage Vivant
It’s taken me a whole two years, but I’m finally persuading Rich to dabble in the dark side. He’s finally having a bash at shooting erotica (with models other than me, I mean.) You’ll note that I don’t use the word “porn” because Rich says he doesn’t do porn, and he gets VERY annoyed if I refer to his work as porn, which I do, frequently, because frankly I don’t see much of a difference. What’s in a label? If a photograph turns you on, does it really matter what it’s called?
Well, apparently it does, according to Rich. He says that it’s like looking at the difference between implied nude and real nude – erotica implies the sexual act rather than shows the sexual act. It’s all about getting the balance right between fantasy and reality.
On the other hand I would describe erotica as high-class porn, shot with dramatic lighting and lots of visible emotion and sensuality. It’s sophisticated porn, but with a story, feelings, a psychological element, although the purpose is the same: to get the viewer hot ‘n’ juicy.
By now most of you will be asking, does anybody actually care whether an image is classified as erotica or porn? Well yes, most photographers DO care very much. They want their images to be erotic so that they are perceived by the general public to be photographers not pornographers. It’s all about photographers being concerned with themselves, how they want to be seen and how they see themselves, whereas it should be about what they shoot. Many photographers are too concerned with how they appear to others (they must be thought of as “respectable photographers”) and not enough with using their skills and imaginations to push their boundaries and realise their erotic creative vision. Is it edgy? Can I shoot edgy but not porn? Is it classy? Does it show too much? Not enough? Is it tasteful? And so on…too much worry about the self-image rather than the end-image.
It makes me wonder what would happen if photographers just stopped thinking about their self image for a moment, and let their emotions fly? If they stepped outside their personal comfort zones, indulged their imaginations and see what happens? Personally I would love to see the results. I suspect the photographs produced would be awesome.
Unfortunately there’s no chance of Rich doing that (just yet anyway) as he’s rather shy, and truth be told, he’s taking it slowly because he’s new at this genre and (by his own admission) erotica requires a completely different photographic puzzle to solve. With Rich, it’s forever about lighting above all-else, and he says that’s something he needs to develop over time. It’s easy to do the dramatic single light from the side of course, but trying to induce a more sophisticated emotional mood through light, without crossing the line into porn (which for him is unacceptable) is proving a consuming challenge.
It’s not all about lighting of course. The pose and expression of the model is important, but it’s also critical to think about the story. A successful photograph is about the message above all else. This is where it gets complex because viewers may perceive erotica and porn differently according to their own subjective opinions and personal tastes. In particular, men and women view erotica differently because they think differently. If women get turned on by ideas and more psychological elements of the scene, men are more visual, so the secret is to ensure your story appeals to both. In order to achieve a powerful erotic photograph, all these elements have to come together at just the right time, for that split second, in order to create that image which will push the right emotional buttons of your viewers. Erotica is all about stimulation of the mind rather than the body, and leaving that viewer desperately wanting to see just that little bit more…
One thing is for sure, if photographers stopped obsessing about what is acceptable and tasteful so much, they'd get a lot further with their erotic photography. Ultimately the classification attributed to your photograph is unimportant. What is important is that you stop worrying about what others think of you because all that will do is get in the way of your creative vision.
Let your mind go and your photography will follow.
Images are of HoneyB of course. Rich isn’t sure if he "crossed the line" into porn with that last shot. Personally I think he worries about lines too much. Just keep shooting, and the rest will take care of itself.




11 Comments:
"Eroticism has its own moral justification because it says that pleasure is enough for me; it is a statement of the individual's sovereignty."
Mario Vargas Llosa
Latin American Author
Now were talking - Porn - Smut - Down and Dirty - risque, but since I walk upright with opposable thumbs, I'll call it erotic. Words and definitions, strange bedfellows sometimes.
Oh...yes I like the dark side. If I was a nude shooter it's the place I'd go most often. Why? Because as Mario says, it gives me pleasure. Why? Don't know. I didn't wire this brain, I just live with it.
I look at the nude for one reason. It gives me pleasure. Some just give me more than others. I love to put "my" story into the image. Really...what makes an image great to the viewer is the story your head writes for it.
What makes it acceptable or not? Mostly religion - some social pressure - some family attitude of sex as we grew up. That is if we grew up. I find very little is what I'd call porn. Mostly porn to me is if it involves children or the person was forced to participate.
I find it strange that you can shoot a woman all day long showing her breasts and ass, but open her legs and show that vertical smile...BAM the context has changed. It just proves the power of a woman - even in a photo she becomes the graven image.
To end this I must say, that is the most erotic stool I have ever seen.
D.L. Wood
Kudos to Rich on some beautiful erotica.
To me, what separates porn from erotica is the emotion expressed. Orixx and I just did an erotic shoot with Joe Crachiola, and we really pushed boundaries with it. What struck Joe and me when we looked at some of the images afterward was the emotional power. This power begets "art," not "porn."
To me, porn is the glass-eyed look of women I used to see in magazines like Hustler. They were either emotionless or the emotions were badly faked. When the feeling is there and it's genuine, no matter what act is depicted, I can't see how it could be "porn."
This goes along with D.L.'s wonderful comment. Honest emotion suggests "the story" in the image. If there's no story, the picture fails to elevate above pornographic tastelessness.
Photographers are deluding themselves if they think the general public distinguishes (in any real and meaningful way) the differences between erotica and porn. It's all perceived as porn by many people and if you're the author of such work you're a pornographer in their eyes.
Would love to see Jimmy D's take on this....
I have to jump in and agree with the 2 previous posts, I think. I think erotica is one of the hardest things to shoot because if not done well it falls into MY definition of porn. (The Taliban have their own definition which I find a tad too restrictive. as are the penalties.) My definition of porn having nothing to do with what is depicted (unless it is "gratuitous violence) and all to do with my perception of the quality of the depiction.
Rich should look on this genre as a real challenge - although he has produced some excellent items of erotica in the past, such as that excellent one of the "orb being drawn from within" [I haven't tried my spin on that yet Lin, but will email you when I do as I said I would.], I haven't seen him do porn yet.
The word "pornography" derives from a Greek word meaning to write about prostitutes.
"Erotica," on the other hand, derives from the Greek word "eros," meaning sexual love.
Based on etymology, the difference does seem to be emotional--sex for love and desire, or "eros," as opposed to sex faked for money.
Oh, my...
Love the images, Lin. Just to add in my 2 cents, even though I do not do much in terms of erotica, I'd say the biggerst difference is that erotica is still an artistic expression. This goes hand in hand with the difference between shooting the nude and taking a picture of someone naked.
Art imitates life. Sex is still a fact of life and the ultimate expression of passion and feelings. Who's to say the line has to be drawn at the edge of sex and implied sex. I think art can still encompass the actual act of sex under the erotic umbrella, but I don't thing the same cannot be said of pornography. I've seen images that depict the act itself, but the main intent was not arouse. There was definately a shock value to it, but it elicit a feeling of arousal.
The general public may well indeed classify it all as porn. That being the case, we still know better. I also agree that its not the easiest thing in the world to pull off, but then again, neither is capturing the nude.
Great post, Lin. I have got to make my way across the waters :)
All good points made here.
Erotic/porn...vast gray areas that each has an idea what is to himself/herself.
Wonderful images, and like other, I like the stool too.
Really thoughtful comments here.
But is the real question not so much about the words used to label an image, but about acceptability, good and bad, right and wrong?
Another question would be, "If the intent is porn, but the perception isn't, what is it?"
Just as we could ask, "If the intent is not porn, but the perception is, what is it?"
I've been looking at both pictures for a while now.....what stool????
Great discussion folks. Thanks to all. Very enlightening :-)
I have to agree with the comments made by Unbearable Lightness. I've shot quite a bit of erotica for somebody who has only been modeling one year. Why? Because I find porn so fake and pathetic.. no emotion to it, no story.. yet I am a very sexual person. And a very emotional & genuine person. I think doing erotica just fits my personality. It is my favorite type of image to view, and to create. Because it is real. It is raw emotions. I would much rather be a part of that than some generic figure studies where the model is overly posed and has no facial expression. I like photography that is truly capturing something. I love these images, by the way.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home