The Language Of Grey
“The photographer's palette is a thousand shades of gray.”
H.E. Clark
My oldest son is learning basic photography at senior school. He’s being taught to experiment with both colour and black and white. So far he doesn’t like his colour photos much. “Colour,” he said, “just doesn’t work for me. It doesn’t matter if I draw something or photograph it, the result is the same. Pictures are simpler, more beautiful in black and white.”
Weird huh? Now that I think about it, he’s probably right, but up until now, I must admit I’d always thought the exact opposite. I’d always associated beauty first and foremost with colour. Think about the millions of photos out there of beautiful sunsets or fantastic mountain scenes. Our brains’ perceptions of colour come with a hard-wired set of emotional responses. Green, for example is associated with lush nature and evokes a calming response, blue evokes a feeling of coolness and space, orange means warmth. But what emotion is associated with grey? In a black and white image there is no such pre-programmed psychological response. It’s more like a documentary where you, the viewer, looks in on the depicted mountain scene from the outside. You recognise the B+W photograph as an art-piece, a representation. Now contrast this with the same mountain photograph in colour, and you will suddenly see it very differently. Your brain will bring the scene alive in your mind and your imagination will instantly transport you to that mountain, you will feel the beautiful blue of the sky and the green grass surround you as if you were really there. So unlike a vibrant colour photograph, a B+W image creates a very definite psychological distance between the viewer and the image.
But is a B+W photograph simpler? Hmm. Yes…and no. A B+W image is simple and sophisticated at the same time. You have to study it, work at it in order to feel a reaction. There’s no instant automatic response of “ooh, that’s a pretty sunset!” Instead you have to think about the inner message within the image. There’s certainly a huge amount of mood and emotion to be had within the B+W image, but you have to engage your intellect before you feel it. You have to first understand and interpret all the different nuances that make up the hundreds of shades of grey.
Black and white photographs are subtler, more elegant, more alluring, they are an intelligent conversation rather than instant gratification. In the current digital age with millions of colour photos everywhere you look, they stand out easily in a sea of colour images. They ooze class, style, and evoke a sense of timelessness. They look older (even though they might have been taken only an hour ago) because early photography was exclusively B+W so there is an association with endurance and agelessness. Plus there’s also the element of permanence. B+W photos are thought to last longer before fading. O.K. with modern photographic technology that’s no longer true but photographers think they do, so they have a more lasting feel to them.
Many modern photographers argue that precisely because B+W photographs are designed to look old, they are therefore outdated, obsolete, even trite. Fine art photographers are often accused of wallowing in nostalgia, even faking their work to appear artistic simply because it is in B+W. “It’s easy to produce an arty photo of beauty,” the critics sneer. “Just snap a gorgeous woman and convert it to B+W, and hey presto, you have instant art!”
However, for all this perceived simplicity, I would argue that good B+W photographs are actually harder to produce. How do you communicate the message of your image by using grey? Which emotion fits which part of the tonal range? You can’t just snap away blindly, hoping for the best. It takes skill and forethought to communicate in the language of grey. You’re not just recording a scene “as is.” You’re creating a mood, an ambience, a style. In that split second before you press the shutter, you have to imagine what an image is going to look like finished and printed, so as to judge how to use the light as a tool to capture that perfect shade of grey and thus capture the precise emotion you were looking for.
Yikes! Sounds complicated? That’s because it is. As a B+W photographer you have to be a highly talented clairvoyant. You have to see the future before it happens, which takes an immense amount of skill and forethought. When done successfully, the results can evoke a very powerful emotional reaction, and IMO that’s what makes B+W photography such an incredible artistic medium.
Am I making any sense here?
Well obviously not, because after reading this my son rolled his eyes and gave me one of his “Mother’s off on one of her arty-farty-ramblings again” looks.
“O.K. Smarty-pants,” I snapped. “Why do you prefer B+W over colour then?”
“Maybe I’ve just been living with you too long,” he replied tartly.
Is it me, or are teenagers getting bolshier nowadays?
Labels: Lynx, Philosophy




11 Comments:
bolshie or bolshy (Brit & NZ informal)
Adjective
1. difficult to manage; rebellious
2. politically radical or left-wing
Noun
pl -shies
any political radical [from Bolshevik]
Colo(u)r me illuminated.
Hah! Good post, but let me add a small addendum. You emphasize the ability to capture (and "print" greys), but for me black and white is all about the blacks. A problem too often encountered with color photographs is that hue and tint yield the picture's emotional content, whereas the real power of photography lies in the ability to either capture (or to create) true blacks within the scene.
A workshop instructor several years ago terms it "sudden black" -- the necessity to introduce some noticeable portion of true (0/0/0) black in the photo.
Some photographers overdo it -- Annie Leibowitz for example. Think of the great black and white OR color photographs, however, and chances are the artist has assured that some portion of the photo printed to black.
As usual, a wonderful text, a true analysis, a fine article ! Wow... I'm impressed...
Thanks Stephen.
Brooks (Jensen) went on at some length about the difficulties of printing true black, which he does in Lenswork by printing twice, black on black, to get a really deep black.
Can viewers actually see true black on current monitors or do you have to actually see a print to really appreciate the full effect? Is the emotional impact of the message within the photograph lost if you can't see the full extent of the black (because you are viewing it online?)
It's long been recognized that you can't print true black with Epson matte black inks. You get close with photo black on lustre or glossy papers. You get closest (in fact exceeding the blacks of GS prints) by using photo black ink on the relatively new baryta papers.
No, you can't see true blacks on most (all?) CRTs. LCD or plasma screens get closer, and in fact in an environment with little or no ambient light, show for all practical purposes true blacks.
I always must use the histogram to determine if I've got true blacks and to what extent.
As far as I'm concerned, however, there is no substitute for a print. A print's visceral impact -- as you already know -- is so much greater than what may be seen on screen. The "true" blacks are only part of that equation, however. Viewing fine art photography online is like licking the outside of a grilled filet mignon -- you get only a sense of the extraordinary tastes within.
Many years ago when I was first starting out I sold a sunset, a city-scape of the lake with a boat with a person who seemed to be waving. It was a B&W sunset and the woman who bought it was so pleased that she could use her imagination. That the true magic of B&W, it cuts the clutter of everyday life so your imagination can fill in the details. Like a good book.
M
Ohhhhhhhhh, I so want to get in on this topic, but I have no idea what to say.
I don't buy the argument that B&W is somehow "more subtler, more elegant, more alluring..."
Nor do I buy the argument that only B&W requires photographers to engage their intellect, or that understanding and interpreting "all the different nuances that make up the hundreds of shades of grey" is any more difficult than understanding and interpreting the same hundreds of shades of each color within the spectrum of any particular image.
Indeed, on almost any level, B&W is a much simpler medium. An almost irrefutable argument can be made that because the medium of color comprises so many more visual complexities and relationships than B&W that it is extraordinarily more difficult to master.
And to suggest that color photographers blindly record scenes "as is;" or that they aren't thinking about mood, ambiance, or style; or that they aren't using light as a tool to realize a specific emotion is, well, just silly.
Both mediums - B&W and color - are fully capable of producing beautiful, sensuous, artful images that stir the very wide gamut of human emotions. In the end, whether that objective is reached is about the photographer not the medium.
Will
WillT,
When you take a colour photograph, you look through the lens, compose the image for what you want to portray and press the shutter. WYSIWYG.
When you take a black and white photograph you do all of the above, and then, in your head, you have to process the image to reduce it to its tonal range given the colour to grey transform that will be applied either by the film or by your choice of black and white conversion process.
In colour you can see two colours that have the same grey value as being different, in black and white those two colours may appear as a single tone.
To say that B&W is simpler in every respect is to simply hand over all aspects of the process to your workflow defaults.
To say "on almost any level, B&W is a much simpler medium" is well, just silly.
Richard,
Your description of how a color photograph is created highlights your presumption that color work is artistically inferior, and that during its creation little if any activity is taking place between the photographer's two ears. I'll stand by my earlier comments.
Will
I like color, but I think only certain photographers can really do it, and pull it off well.. a lot of people should just stick to B&W, because color is hard to understand. I'm really obsessed with color. Other people don't grasp it quite the same.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home